Quiénes somos
La propiedad industrial e intelectual es nuestra pasión.
Las ideas y la innovación son nuestro motor.
Trabajamos incansablemente para salvaguardarlos y ayudar a nuestros clientes a innovar y ser motor de cambio.
En HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER sabemos que nuestros clientes precisan de un abogado especialista en propiedad industrial e intelectual que conozca su industria, que sea franco, directo y capaz de cumplir. Pase lo que pase.
Contamos con un equipo en Europa de más de un centenar de profesionales de la propiedad industrial e intelectual. En la firme creencia de que la calidad jurídica no puede quedar comprometida, decidimos dedicar nuestra práctica exclusivamente a la propiedad industrial e intelectual y a materias regulatorias conexas. Contamos también con la experiencia y con los conocimientos técnicos necesarios para enfrentarnos a los desafíos tecnológicos que frecuentemente protagonizan los conflictos en materia de propiedad industrial. Nuestra experiencia y nuestra mentalidad pionera se alían en la representación de asuntos de gran envergadura que en muchos casos son transfronterizos.
HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER es la firma de referencia en materia de propiedad industrial e intelectual en Europa.
Últimas Noticias
Enforcing UPC decisions in practice: from direct effect to penalties
Enforcement before the UPC starts from a simple premise: the UPC decision itself is the enforcement title. Article 82(1) UPCA provides that decisions and orders of the Court are enforceable in any Contracting Member State, without exequatur or any further domestic recognition step. The order for enforcement is appended to the decision itself. The framework around this principle of direct enforceability has been progressively developed by the Court of Appeal, notably in Sumi Agro v Syngenta (UPC_CoA_523/2024), Boehringer Ingelheim v Zentiva (UPC_CoA_446/2025) and Fujifilm v Kodak (UPC_CoA_699/2025). In practice, UPC enforcement raises three distinct sets of questions: the decision to enforce final decisions on the merits under Rule 118.8 RoP, the direct enforceability of provisional measures under Art. 62 UPCA, and the consequences of non-compliance under the UPC's penalty regime under Art. 82(4) UPCA.
UPC Unfiltered, by Willem Hoyng – UPC decisions week 23, 2026
Below, Prof. Willem Hoyng provides his unfiltered views on the decisions that were published on the website of the Unified Patent Court (“UPC”) last week. His comments offer a unique insight into the UPC’s case law, as he chairs the Advisory Board of the UPC and participated in drafting the Rules of Procedure of the UPC.
Interested in more of this? Stay tuned and subscribe here for weekly updates.
Find all decisions, commentary and more on our UPC Intelligence Platform.
On the go, multi-tasking or just prefer to listen? “Willem Hoyng’s UPC Unfiltered AI Podcast” – your weekly, AI-generated podcast discussing Willem Hoyng’s commentary on UPC case law of last week, offers a convenient alternative. Listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.
UPC Unfiltered, by Willem Hoyng – UPC decisions week 22, 2026
Below, Prof. Willem Hoyng provides his unfiltered views on the decisions that were published on the website of the Unified Patent Court (“UPC”) last week. His comments offer a unique insight into the UPC’s case law, as he chairs the Advisory Board of the UPC and participated in drafting the Rules of Procedure of the UPC.
Interested in more of this? Stay tuned and subscribe here for weekly updates.
Find all decisions, commentary and more on our UPC Intelligence Platform.
On the go, multi-tasking or just prefer to listen? “Willem Hoyng’s UPC Unfiltered AI Podcast” – your weekly, AI-generated podcast discussing Willem Hoyng’s commentary on UPC case law of last week, offers a convenient alternative. Listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.