Über uns
Geistiges Eigentum ist unsere Leidenschaft.
Ideen und Innovationen treiben uns an.
Wir arbeiten unermüdlich daran, sie zu schützen und unsere Mandanten dabei zu unterstützen, mit ihren Innovationen die Welt um uns herum zu verändern.
HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER vereint IP-Anwälte, die die jeweiligen Branchen kennen und geradeheraus, konsequent sowie in der Lage sind, unmittelbar, anwendbare und präzise Ergebnisse zu liefern. Unter allen Umständen.
Unser engagiertes, europäisches Team besteht aus über 100 Experten im Bereich des gewerblichen Rechtsschutzes. Wir sind davon überzeugt, dass die Qualität der Rechtsberatung keine Kompromisse duldet. Wir haben uns daher ausschließlich dem gewerblichen Rechtsschutz und den angrenzenden regulatorischen Rechtsgebieten verschrieben. Wir verfügen über die notwendigen technischen Kenntnisse und das Know-how, um auch mit komplexen und herausfordernden Technologien umzugehen, die regelmäßig Gegenstand von IP-Streitigkeiten sind. Unsere Erfahrung und unser Pioniergeist sind wegweisend, insbesondere bei der Vielzahl bedeutender Fälle, die wir grenzüberschreitend führen.
HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER gehört zu den führenden Kanzleien für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz in Europa.
Aktuelle Meldungen
Enforcing UPC decisions in practice: from direct effect to penalties
Enforcement before the UPC starts from a simple premise: the UPC decision itself is the enforcement title. Article 82(1) UPCA provides that decisions and orders of the Court are enforceable in any Contracting Member State, without exequatur or any further domestic recognition step. The order for enforcement is appended to the decision itself. The framework around this principle of direct enforceability has been progressively developed by the Court of Appeal, notably in Sumi Agro v Syngenta (UPC_CoA_523/2024), Boehringer Ingelheim v Zentiva (UPC_CoA_446/2025) and Fujifilm v Kodak (UPC_CoA_699/2025). In practice, UPC enforcement raises three distinct sets of questions: the decision to enforce final decisions on the merits under Rule 118.8 RoP, the direct enforceability of provisional measures under Art. 62 UPCA, and the consequences of non-compliance under the UPC's penalty regime under Art. 82(4) UPCA.
UPC Unfiltered, by Willem Hoyng – UPC decisions week 23, 2026
Below, Prof. Willem Hoyng provides his unfiltered views on the decisions that were published on the website of the Unified Patent Court (“UPC”) last week. His comments offer a unique insight into the UPC’s case law, as he chairs the Advisory Board of the UPC and participated in drafting the Rules of Procedure of the UPC.
Interested in more of this? Stay tuned and subscribe here for weekly updates.
Find all decisions, commentary and more on our UPC Intelligence Platform.
On the go, multi-tasking or just prefer to listen? “Willem Hoyng’s UPC Unfiltered AI Podcast” – your weekly, AI-generated podcast discussing Willem Hoyng’s commentary on UPC case law of last week, offers a convenient alternative. Listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.
UPC Unfiltered, by Willem Hoyng – UPC decisions week 22, 2026
Below, Prof. Willem Hoyng provides his unfiltered views on the decisions that were published on the website of the Unified Patent Court (“UPC”) last week. His comments offer a unique insight into the UPC’s case law, as he chairs the Advisory Board of the UPC and participated in drafting the Rules of Procedure of the UPC.
Interested in more of this? Stay tuned and subscribe here for weekly updates.
Find all decisions, commentary and more on our UPC Intelligence Platform.
On the go, multi-tasking or just prefer to listen? “Willem Hoyng’s UPC Unfiltered AI Podcast” – your weekly, AI-generated podcast discussing Willem Hoyng’s commentary on UPC case law of last week, offers a convenient alternative. Listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.